Blog
About
Indices
Films by Title Gateway Cinephile Posts by Date The Take-Up and Other Posts by Date Horror Cinema David Lynch's Shorts John Ford's Silents H. P. Lovecraft Adaptations Twin Peaks: The Return Westworld Freeze Frame Archive
What I Read

Gateway Cinephile

Appreciation and Criticism of Cinema Through Heartland Eyes
Blog
About
Indices
Films by Title Gateway Cinephile Posts by Date The Take-Up and Other Posts by Date Horror Cinema David Lynch's Shorts John Ford's Silents H. P. Lovecraft Adaptations Twin Peaks: The Return Westworld Freeze Frame Archive
What I Read
RedRidingEssayGrab01.jpg

A Howl For This Fallen World: The Exquisite Despair of Red Riding

[Note: This essay contains no significant spoilers.]

We drive up the motorway, the M1, listening in silence as the stories eventually change, as they move on to two and a half million unemployed, a job lost every two minutes, on to H Blocks and the Eastern Bloc, to a local woman who cut her own throat with a pair of electric hedge clippers.

"Jesus," mutters Murphy as we approach Leeds. "What a fucking place."

—David Peace, Nineteen Eighty

Every now and again, one comes across a film in which genuine aesthetic greatness might be thwarted by various defects in story or style, but which nonetheless works a curiously potent voodoo on the mind.  Such a film bores deep into the brainstem, filling one's subsequent hours, days, and weeks with its unsettling visions and vibrations.  Such a film may not be a masterpiece under any levelheaded assessment, but that is precisely what renders its profoundly affecting character such a mystery, lending it a touch of the sublime.  Now that 2010 is drawing to a close, one work from this year's relatively drab offerings stands out as a superlative example of this phenomenon, wherein a film's peculiar emotional frequency resonates to a degree far out of proportion to its cinematic consequence. That work is Red Riding, a sprawling, perplexing 295-minute excavation of an earthbound Hell.  It is a film that has left me hollowed and haunted, unable to right my emotional life after months of cogitation and revisitation.

The Hebrew Scriptures refer to a place for the departed called Sheol, a chthonic region that the Psalmist describes as forgotten by God and cut off from His hand.  This is an apposite characterization of the setting of Red Riding, where a spiritual darkness pervades each sad little basement pub and lonely moorland hillock.  It is a place without hope: cruelty falls like the gray, ceaseless rain, while corruption seeps into every dwelling and every heart.  Netherworlds of such unrelenting bleakness are usually confined to the realms of fantasy, but this particular Sheol is terribly real, and its miserable adornments are all too familiar to anyone over thirty years of age. For Red Riding is a grim tale of 1970s and 1980s Yorkshire, and while the names and faces are slightly fictionalized, the feeling—the atmosphere of the North in this era of mortal terror and broken promises—is chillingly pristine.  This is the beguiling paradox that throbs at the heart of the film: Its towering, nearly overpowering mood of desolation transcends time and place, and yet to evoke this mood the filmmakers rely on a setting that is ruthless in its specificity.

RedRidingEssayGrab05.jpg

David Peace knows this setting well.  Born in 1967 and raised in Ossett, West Yorkshire, Peace penned the four Red Riding novels on which Channel 4's film adaptation is based, giving dread form to the woes that scuttled through the landscape of his childhood and adolescence. The novels are murky and rambling things, a fusion of crime thriller conventions and flashy modernism that never quite finds full-throated success in either sphere. Deep within this strange amalgamation, however, Peace unearths a mood as evocative and unsettling as anything in contemporary fiction, literary or otherwise.  The Red Riding quartet quivers with a despair so acute that submitting to Peace's prose is an oddly exquisite experience, a plummet into an abyss whose dismal splendor and sheer scale can only be cherished from within.  The potency of the saga's atmospherics is exceeded only by their remarkable endurance: across seven protagonists, nine years, and over 1,400 pages, Peace conveys an unremitting abhorrence for the world and everything it contains.

Screenwriter Tony Grisoni takes copious liberties with the narrative details of Peace's desolate epic, above and beyond excising an entire novel (Nineteen Seventy-Seven, the second work in the quartet). Grisoni trims the cast significantly, although his adaptation retains ample characters to suit the film's portrayal of widespread corruption and conspiracy. Roles are amalgamated or written out altogether, while events are rearranged, relocated, and repurposed. The elaborate alterations to the story provide ripe opportunity for an obsessive side-by-side comparison of novel and film, but such evaluation is wholly unnecessary.  To be sure, narrative detail is essential to Peace's novels, as its accrual serves to convey the enormity and obscurity of the series' malevolent world, amplifying the reader's sense of vulnerability and powerlessness. However, Grisoni's shrewd and outstanding adaptation comprehends that while the occurrence of complexity is essential to Red Riding, it is feasible to tinker with that complexity without diminishing the work's power.

RedRidingEssayGrab07.jpg

It is no shame to lose one's way in the labyrinth of Red Riding, a dim realm cobbled together from muddy construction sites, dank bedrooms with peeling wallpaper, and gray corridors that buzz with fluorescent sickness.  In Peace's novel Nineteen Eighty, a recurring line hints that the story's density is not an obstacle course to be negotiated: On the dark stair, we miss our step. If our ankle turns on Red Riding's countless sins--the bribes and blackmail, the blowjobs and betrayals, the rapes and murders, and the lies upon lies--we can take cold comfort in the fact that it is by design.  In imitation of our Virgils—Eddie Dunford (1974), Peter Hunter (1980), John Piggott, Maurice Jobson, and BJ (all 1983)—our expanding comprehension of this world's dark contours requires that we lose our way, that we stumble and scrape our palms raw.  In its affection for a flurry of often bewildering detail, Red Riding echoes the stratagem of two late American masterpieces about real-world crimes, Oliver Stone's JFK and David Fincher's Zodiac.  The crucial thematic concerns of those films are not evident from a dry reading of the facts, but emerge only when the facts swirl about in an esoteric true-crime maelstrom (with a liberal dose of fiction). However, where JFK aims to give cinematic form to the conspiratorial mindset of modern American politics, and Zodiac offers an uneasy reproach to our collective need for concrete conclusions, Red Riding's timbre is not political or psychological but fiercely existential.  It poses a world replete with madness and wickedness and asks: What can we do but scream?

Such angst-laden queries sprout with distressing ease in Peace's Yorkshire, a land where the damp newspapers bleat of backhand deals, hunger strikes, and bloody ball-peen hammers.  Grisoni and the film's three directors—Julian Jarrold (1974), James Marsh (1980), and Arnand Tucker (1983)—are all British natives or emigrants, and they are vigorously aware of the distinct, fearsome aura that Peace's setting demands.  Indeed, the novelist is, in a sense, the film's ambivalent, fearful auteur, and the success of Red Riding is due in no small part to how superbly the filmmakers translate the trappings and essence of Peace's world to celluloid (or pixels, in Tucker's case).  The Yorkshire of Red Riding is an exaggerated vision of the North—uglier, meaner, more rotten in its teeth and heart—but the amplification is slight. Within Red Riding's warped boundaries, the jagged malaise of the Wilson and Thatcher years feels uncommonly genuine and urgent, bestowing on the film a formidable transporting quality that few period pieces can boast.  Sinking into the film's abyssal folds renders the past decades of real-world history as little more than a dream.  Here, the Devil still cruises the M1 in a rusty Transit van, and the future is still awash in Soviet-born nuclear fire.

RedRidingEssayGrab03.jpg

Setting is the central component of Red Riding's dread spell, and the film's sustained and persuasive attentiveness to place is all the more striking given that the three chapters employ distinct production designers (Christina Casali, Tom Burton, and Alison Dominitz) and cinematographers (Rob Hardy, Igor Martinovic, and David Higgs). The film's spaces are familiar: sitting rooms, offices, pubs, restaurants, garages, holding cells, hotel rooms, hospital wards, alleyways, vacant lots.  More than mere backdrops, these spaces comprise a visual vocabulary of menace and desperation. "All great buildings resemble crimes, they say," Yorkshire Post reporter Barry Gannon (Anthony Flanagan) muses provocatively, but in Red Riding every building seems to be a transgression wrought in cheap laminate, linoleum, aluminum, and concrete.  Every room is drained and shabby, yellow with cigarette smoke, full of worn, chipped furnishings to accommodate worn, chipped souls.  Fissures—visible and invisible—run through everything, even Shangri-La, the lavishly designed abode of construction magnate John Dawson (Sean Bean).  Hideous, modern buildings loom over the landscape, monolithic testaments to the foolish sanguinity of humankind's optimism. Rain-slick motorways snake over the lonely moors, stitching together grimy cities and shitty little towns, while in the distance nuclear cooling towers belch Christ-only-knows-what into slate skies.  In surveying these sights, one gradually becomes sensitive to the peculiar black magic of Red Riding: the cruel fidelity of its vision establishes that we are in a real place, and yet the stench of Purgation is everywhere.

RedRidingEssayGrab06.jpg

Nearly as essential are the visages of the vast ensemble cast.  Many of the performers seem to have been tapped solely on the basis of their expressive eyes, brows, or lips. Critics might justly dismiss the casting of the film for its reliance on expedient shorthand in lieu of deeper characterization, but given the vast and multifaceted character of Red Riding's tale, the faces and voices provide a vital means of orienting the viewer.  They are landmarks in a sea wracked by confusion and alienation: Dawson's menacing smirk; Bill Malloy's (Warren Clarke) bullfrog scowl; Jack Whitehead's (Eddie Marsan) splendid sneer; Michael Myskin's (Daniel Mays) doughy countenance and slack grin; Martin Laws' (Peter Mullan) twinkling eyes; Bob Craven's (Sean Harris) oily mustache on a weasel mug; BJ's (Robert Sheehan) uneasy scoffs and glances. Then there are the women, who all wear the same expression of apprehension and simmering bitterness, the look that eventually settles over the faces of all Yorkshire lasses after hearing the same hissed words—"cow," "slag," "bitch," "whore"—relentlessly, day after miserable day, year after miserable year. Observing the women, one can see how such a place could birth the Ripper: the way Paula Garland (Rebecca Hall) pulls her thin sweater over her thin frame; the way Helen Marshall (Maxine Peake) is perpetually averting her eyes; the way Libby Hall (Julia Ford) inclines her head and smiles a little too quickly.  Red Riding is too immense and impressionistic to qualify as a "performance film," and yet every one of its performers seems remarkably attuned to the tale's dense, pungent miasma. Every sideways look and nervous swallow, every heaving sigh and spitting retort contributes to the verisimilitude of the setting, if not the story.

What of the story, then? It is a dizzying thing, resistant to the sort of forensic scrutiny that the Yorkshire detectives might apply, where they not complicit in the tale's ghastly crimes.  Like the policemen in David Simon's episodic urban tragedy The Wire—whose glacial, accretive narrative and moral ambiguity mark it as a cousin to Red Riding—one might sketch an organizational chart for the film and populate it with names, places, dates, crimes, even tidbits of evidence in tiny plastic bags.  No earth-shattering revelation would be forthcoming from such an exercise, however. By the conclusion of Red Riding, one knows (with some uncertainty) who extorted whom, who molested whom, and who murdered whom, but there is no shock or outrage, merely a vague sense that what has come to pass is terrible, just as everything that happens in this forsaken Yorkshire is terrible. Even Christmas, it turns out, is full of raging fires and moldering corpses.

RedRidingEssayGrab02.jpg

Moreover, should one persist in sketching those lines of connection and then take a step back, one would discover that the arrows and names have encompassed the whole hideous world. Somewhere, an arrow will point to each of us.  As Barry Gannon declares, "Everything's linked. Show me two things that aren't connected." Eddie Dunford (Andrew Garfield), evincing the sort of naïveté that is the singular province of the hot-blooded and the ambitious, claims that he cares about the murder of children, not shady real estate deals and political corruption. ("If it bleeds, it leads.")  Spotlessly clean Manchester copper Peter Hunter (Paddy Considine) goes to Leeds with crystal-clear mission parameters: expose the Yorkshire police blunders that have permitted the Ripper to butcher thirteen women.  Each of these men suffers form the delusion that their search for the truth can be constrained by boundaries, even as Red Riding proves time and again that borders are mutable and porous.  On the dark stair, we miss our step, stumbling across borders without even realizing it.

Eddie and Hunter are too heedlessly zealous and too convinced of their own righteousness to penetrate Yorkshire's bulwarks.  It is no accident that the truth is finally cracked open by defeated, self-loathing lawyer John Piggott (Mark Addy), a man the North has ground down to a wad of sweaty nothing, and by crooked detective Maurice "The Owl" Jobson (David Morrissey), who sold his soul so long ago that its fresh stirrings seem like the slurred rumblings of a drunken enemy. Piggott and Jobson—and poor, wounded BJ—understand what Eddie and Hunter cannot. All of Yorkshire's sins are connected, and they all sprout from the same place: the Red Riding, a spiritual wasteland not found any map of the county, ancient or modern.  It leaves its traces on greasy takeaway wrappers and sticky skin magazines. It bubbles up wherever a weary mother catalogs fresh drywall dents and bruises; wherever unlucky hustlers taste concrete and broken teeth; wherever wicked men gather to raise glasses to their venality and greed, as though such failings were gleaming medals.

RedRidingEssayGrab04.jpg

Viewers with little patience for unrelenting gloom may be skeptical of Red Riding's worth as a work of entertainment. The films relies upon the tropes and patterns of crime thrillers, but nothing in its formal or thematic character suggests a whodunit gewgaw unfolding for our pulse-quickening titillation. This is not cinema as diversion, but a five-hour hymn to the awfulness of the world, with little in the way of nuance or qualification.  What distinguishes Red Riding from the thickheaded nihilism embraced by most contemporary horror films (or, for that matter, underlying most Hollywood fare) is the sheer poetry of its grim vision.  It is the most engrossing and haunting kind of art, in which loveliness is not a conspicuous surface feature but an emergent phenomenon, the product of foul raw materials that do not suggest such potential.  Admittedly, Red Riding's loveliness is the blackest sort conceivable, but it is loveliness just the same.  Grisoni's adaptation alters the unbearably bleak conclusion of Peace's novels, providing some semblance of release and salvation for the characters, but the message of Red Riding is not that happy endings can still occur in this fallen world. Rather, the film's meaning is revealed by the very existence of the film: even in Sheol, there is splendor.

PostedDecember 15, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesEssays
3 CommentsPost a comment
HarryPotterHallows1Poster.jpg

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

No More Pencils, No More Books

2010 // UK - USA // David Yates // November 28, 2010 // Theatrical Print (Regal Biltmore Grande Stadium 15)

B- - The film adaptations of J.K. Rowling’s staggeringly popular fantasy novels have perfected a remarkable, distinctive formula. Once the banal hand of Chris Columbus was pried from the franchise following Chamber of Secrets, every chapter in the saga has exhibited the same characteristics: an ever-burgeoning cast of wizards, monsters, and other sundry characters seemingly destined to encompass every British thespian of note; maddeningly convoluted plots, conveyed so sketchily that only devoted fans of the books can hope to comprehend what the hell is going on; stunning, inspired production design overseen by the invaluable Stuart Craig; and exceedingly game, unfailingly charming performances from series principals Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson. The seventh film in the series, the first of a two-part finale, sticks closely to this template, a thoroughly unadventurous and (at this late date) sensible approach. Having shepherded the saga through its previous two chapters, director David Yates has learned that such a formula reliably bestows a patina of epic artistry on the franchise, inoculates it against conventional criticism, and just happens to reap billions of dollars. The films cannot be dismissed as trifling—they represent, for better or worse, the most ambitious work of long-form fantasy cinema in history—but as the series reaches its end, their significance as entertainment to viewers not already hooked on Harry’s adventures is doubtful. Which leads to the most essential question regarding Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1: How good is it, when approached strictly as the penultimate entry in the broader saga? The answer: Exactly as good as it needs to be to bring loyal Potterheads (including yours truly) back for one more outing.

The latest chapter finds Harry (Radcliffe), Ron (Grint), and Hermione (Watson) forsaking their seventh year at Hogwarts for a fugitive life, now that Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) has been slain and the wizarding world has been overrun by the forces of the Dark Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes). Breaking free from the episodic design of the previous films, which were snugly reliant on the discrete Hogwarts school years, Deathly Hallows launches the heroic Trio out into a wider and more perilous world. This, of course, dovetails nicely with Harry’s emergence from adolescence into adulthood, with all the frightening responsibilities and uncertainties that transition entails. Appropriately enough, the world beyond Hogwarts has become forlorn and yawning, an exposed wilderness with a distinctly Northern tinting. Treacherous forays into the urban bustle of the Muggle world provide only brief respite for the Trio, who wander aimlessly through a landscape of wind-battered coasts, gray volcanic plateaus, and dismal winter forests. Beyond the cities, signs of life are scarce, and as our heroes squat under drab concrete overpasses and trudge through desiccated fields, their Britain seems a post-apocalyptic environment.

Lack of direction is one of the film’s dilemmas, for Harry, Ron, and Hermione have no better sense for how to move against the Dark Lord than at the conclusion of the previous chapter. Whether out of prudence or obstinacy, Dumbledore provided only the barest hints as to how Harry was to proceed after his death. One of the primary problems with Rowling’s latter novels is the multiplication of MacGuffins: there are far too many Important Items whizzing through the plot, and an even more unwieldy number of Important People and Places. Deathly Hallows: Part 1 presents the bewildered viewer not only with the seven Horcruxes of Half-Blood Prince (items into which Voldemort has placed fragments of his soul) but also a magical sword necessary to destroy these foul objects, not to mention the three titular Hallows, legendary wizard artifacts that will become crucial to the plot. Even to Potterheads it can be dizzying and needlessly elaborate; to the uninitiated it’s virtually guaranteed to be outright incomprehensible. (At least Tolkein remained resolutely focused on the One Ring.) Yet despite all these Objects of Desire that stud the narrative, Harry and his friends spend much of Deathly Hallows mired in their own imperfect knowledge, uncertain of the next step on their quest. Unfortunately, this means that there is a lot of running and hiding and reading, peppered with spontaneous and ill-advised gambits, which makes for a prolonged, often directionless story. While there’s an undeniably potent correspondence between Harry’s predicament and the often doubtful shift to adulthood, there’s little pleasure in watching the plot inch along stiffly for two and a half hours, especially compared to the relatively lively pacing and drama of Half-Blood Prince. Structurally speaking, these flaws are entirely understandable, given that Rowling’s series has always been presented less as a thrilling Heroes’ Journey than an intense, fantastical allegory for the process of growing up, with a deep debt to the tradition of English boarding school stories. Unfortunately, this route often makes for some exceedingly lifeless “adventure” in what is ostensibly a fantasy adventure series, and never more so than in Deathly Hallows: Part 1.

As with all the post-Chamber Potter adaptations, the latest film compels not by faithfully recreating scenes from the novels, but by its omissions and digressions, and by its sumptuous employment of dazzling design to elaborate on Rowling’s already crowded fantasy universe. Even at a presumed running time of five hours over two films, the seventh chapter elides as much as it dares. Meanwhile, Yates emphasizes not only the despair of fresh responsibility, but also the circuitous, mythic dimension to Rowling’s saga. Everything old is new again: People and places long neglected suddenly snap back into focus, and objects hidden in plain sight take on newfound import. Of all the Potter films, only Prisoner of Azkaban dared to be distinctly cinematic in its sensibilities, but every subsequent film has at least been presented as a genuine story with robust emotional and psychological dimensions, rather than a rote checklist of narrative minutiae. For all its grim shapelessness, Deathly Hallows presents its share of worthwhile humane indulgences, such as Ron’s chilling eagerness to torture one of Voldemort’s Death Eaters, or a moment where Harry and Hermione, situated at an emotional nadir, dance sheepishly to a scratchy tune emanating from a “wizard wireless”. The film has its share of emotional fumbles, however, as in its protracted mourning over the demise of an unappealing, mostly forgotten character.

Consistent with the prior films, the most appealing feature of Deathly Hallows is the manner in which the filmmakers drape earnest adolescent allure over an ornately realized fantasy world. The film doesn’t offer as many fresh sights as its predecessors, save for an entrancing animated sequence dramatizing the legend of the Hallows in silhouettes. That said, Yates’ latest chapter ensnares countless characters, creatures, locales, phenomena, and motifs that we’ve seen before, often presented in a slightly different key. The Ministry of Magic, first glimpsed in Order of the Phoenix, has been transformed from a quirky bureaucratic labyrinth into a fascistic edifice of propaganda and thought-policing, where uncloaked dementors twitch on their leashes and the vile, pink-garbed Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton) is enthroned as a simpering inquisitor. This sort of repurposing privileges the uncanny shock of change over the glint of novelty, echoing the film’s bleak treatment of childhood’s demise.  For all his missteps as a storyteller, Yates has done an admirable job of zeroing in on the emotional nodes at the core of Rowling’s tale, chiefly its mournful, frightening depiction of adulthood, so replete with moral confusion, mortal dread, and sexual anxiety. Deathly Hallows is ultimately a tale about the putting away of childish things, a marathon parable that presents rites of passage as opportunities to revisit the familiar with fresh eyes. In Harry’s dire case, every glance reveals deeper shadows: mentors become peers with all-too-human failings, the banalities of everyday life deny him a comforting refuge, and the temptation of cowardice over righteousness waxes daily.

PostedDecember 1, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesReviews
CommentPost a comment
TheIllusionistPoster.jpg

SLIFF 2010: The Illusionist

2010 // UK - France // Sylvain Chomet // November 21, 2010 // Theatrical Print (Hi-Pointe Theater)

Sylvain Chomet's superb new animated feature, The Illusionist, functions as an affectionate homage to the films, spirit, and persona of French filmmaker Jacques Tati, all within a poignant fairy tale about grace and compassion. Oh, and it's also flat-out gorgeous--a triumph of design that boasts fresh delights at every turn. Chomet discards the surrealism of The Triplets of Belleville for this more grounded tale of entrances, meetings, and exits in the fading vaudeville community of 1950s Europe. However, the former film's hallmarks remain: grotesque characters, a reliance on pantomime and mumbled dialog, and a setting realized with breathtaking artistry. Based on an unproduced Tati script, Chomet's film follows the titular stage magician (a caricature of Tati and his Monsieur Hulot character) through a sequence of humiliating gigs, picking up a guileless country girl along the way. The pair eventually settles for a time in a splendidly rendered Edinburgh, where their tender relationship deepens and evolves. Chomet presents this mellow, tearful story with an appealing blend of uneasy pathos, endearing zaniness, and black humor. The Illusionist is a giddy reminder of the evocative potential of traditional animation, a potential that attains full flower in the hands of a master such as Chomet.

PostedNovember 22, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesSLIFF 2010
5 CommentsPost a comment
MilkofSorrowPoster.jpg

SLIFF 2010: The Milk of Sorrow

2009 // Spain - Peru // Claudia Llosa // November 20, 2010 // Theatrical Print (Landmark Plaza Frontenac Cinema)

There's a surfeit of lush sensory pleasures in Peruvian writer-director Claudia Llosa's arresting new feature, The Milk of Sorrow, enhancing the film's potency as a bracing portrait of emotional isolation. Born in the era of Shining Path terror, the timid Fausta (Magaly Solier) has surrounded herself with a moat of reticence and vigilance, especially when it comes to men. Most shockingly, she has taken rather... extreme measures to dissuade rapists. However, the death of her elderly mother acts as a catalyst, forcing the girl into the wider world that she has long shuttered herself against. Llosa's command of the frame is masterful, and she remains resolutely focused on humane details while using the arid Peruvian landscape to fine effect. The film is full of striking images: a demolished piano littered with colored glass; hands plucking scattered pearls from a bathroom floor; a procession of dancing wedding guests with their gifts held aloft. Such remarkable visuals provide a wondrous aesthetic substrate for Llosa's heartfelt, distressing (and at times comical) tale of a woman's emergence from her cocoon of fearfulness. The director presents even the story's most outrageous details with startling conviction and esteem, acknowledging both the terrible power of trauma and the warm, amusing qualities of everyday life.

PostedNovember 21, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesSLIFF 2010
1 CommentPost a comment
BlackSwanPoster.jpg

SLIFF 2010: Black Swan

2010 // USA // Darren Aronofsky // November 19, 2010 // Theatrical Print (Hi-Pointe Theater)

With the engaging but frustrating Black Swan, Darren Aronofsky again expands the range of his generic dabblings, this time to encompass backstage melodrama, psychological thriller, anatomical horror, and a bit of unexpectedly vicious camp. Thematically, however, the director's attention remains fixed on obsession and the annihilation of the self. Indeed, Black Swan plays quite unambiguously as a companion to The Wrestler, as shamelessly operatic in its sensibility as Aronofsky's previous film was tattered and doleful. Ambitious, high-strung ballerina Nina (Natalie Portman) dreams of dancing the lead in Swan Lake ("Done to death, I know," concedes her impresario), but is haunted by strange visions and a sultry rival (Mila Kunis). Portman is flawlessly cast and delivers one of her finest performances in a challenging, rather unsympathetic role. The fingerprints of Polanski, De Palma, Cronenberg, and many other filmmakers are conspicuous, but where Aronofsky falters is not in amalgamating his myriad influences but in controlling the film's tone. Black Swan veers from the grave to the ludicrous so fast that it disorients, while Clint Mansell's Tchaikovsky-indebted score thunders away. The director's often delicate observation of behavior is backgrounded in favor of creepshow spectacle, and the result is a genuine B-picture (a sort of werewolf picture, specifically). Aronofsky's style remains seductive, but Black Swan is his least daring work to date.

PostedNovember 20, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesSLIFF 2010
8 CommentsPost a comment
ARoomandaHalfPoster.jpg

SLIFF 2010: A Room and a Half

2009 // Russia // Andrey Khrzhanovskiy // November 18, 2011 // Theatrical Print (Hi-Pointe Theater)

For his feature film debut, Russian writer-director Andrey Khrzhanovskiy spins an arrhythmic, freewheeling fantasy about Jewish Soviet-American poet Iosif Brodsky, a writer who remains relatively obscure in the popular consciousness of the United States despite a Nobel Prize and stint as our Poet Laureate.  Ripe with dewy Old Country nostalgia and yet scornful of Communist rule and the Russian character generally, A Room and a Half looks at snowy Leningrad through the eyes of a self-aware artist who longs for his childhood (while conceding its bleakness). Framed by a fictional homecoming for the exiled Brodsky, Khrzhanovskiy's approach is amorphous and whimsical, complete with animated digressions, sepia and colorized recollections, and archival footage both real and mock. The film recalls meandering memoirs as diverse as Radio Days, Persepolis, and The Beaches of Agnès, but its most direct antecedent is My Winnipeg. However, A Room and a Half's at times overplayed heartache and dithering tendencies mark it as a lesser film compared to Guy Maddin's dreamy, ambivalent marvel. Khrzhanovskiy studs his film with oddly captivating little detours, but the result is a work that feels unfocused and rambling, one never entirely comfortable with the intensity of its own pathos.

PostedNovember 20, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesSLIFF 2010
1 CommentPost a comment
Newer / Older
RT_CRITIC_TM_BADGE.jpg
The Take-Up Podcast

Twin Peaks: The Return

2007 - 2016: A Personal Cinematic Canon

download.png

Recent Posts

Blog
New Reviews at The Take-Up
about 7 years ago
Miles to Go Before I Sleep
about 7 years ago
Delete Your Account: 'Friend Request'
about 7 years ago
Feminine Mystique: 'mother!'
about 7 years ago
Unmuffled Screams and Broken Hearts - 'Twin Peaks: The Return,' Parts 17 and 18
about 7 years ago
Send in the Clown: 'It'
about 7 years ago
Unmuffled Screams and Broken Hearts - Twin Peaks: The Return, Part 16
about 7 years ago
Fetal Infraction: Prevenge
about 7 years ago
You Don’t Know Why, But You’re Dying to Try: The Lure
about 7 years ago
Unmuffled Screams and Broken Hearts - Twin Peaks: The Return, Part 15
about 7 years ago

© 2007 – 2025 Andrew Wyatt