Blog
About
Indices
Films by Title Gateway Cinephile Posts by Date The Take-Up and Other Posts by Date Horror Cinema David Lynch's Shorts John Ford's Silents H. P. Lovecraft Adaptations Twin Peaks: The Return Westworld Freeze Frame Archive
What I Read

Gateway Cinephile

Appreciation and Criticism of Cinema Through Heartland Eyes
Blog
About
Indices
Films by Title Gateway Cinephile Posts by Date The Take-Up and Other Posts by Date Horror Cinema David Lynch's Shorts John Ford's Silents H. P. Lovecraft Adaptations Twin Peaks: The Return Westworld Freeze Frame Archive
What I Read
BlowUpGrab01.jpg

Blow-Up

1966 // UK - Italy // Michelangelo Antonioni // February 2, 2011 // DVD - Warner Brothers (2004)​

[Note: This post contains minor spoilers. Blow-Up was screened on February 2, 2011 as a part of Strange Brew, the Webster University Film Series' monthly cult film series at Schlafly Bottleworks.]

There is a crucial moment about two-thirds of the way through Blow-Up, a moment that signals definitively, I think, that Antonioni's weirdly exciting film is evolving into something more profound than "just" a giddy depiction of London in the Swinging Sixties, or "merely" a remorselessly ambiguous thriller. David Hemming's obnoxiously self-assured fashion photographer Thomas, having revisited the public park were he unwittingly documented a murder on film, returns to his studio to pore over the successive enlargements that seem to storyboard the dastardly deed. Unfortunately, the studio has been ransacked by an unknown party; one grainy enlargement remains, wedged between two pieces of furniture. Thomas explains to his neighbor Patricia (Sarah Miles) that the print depicts the murder victim's body lying prone on the grass. However, she sees nothing of the sort, just a collection of dots that resembles one of the abstract expressionist spatter paintings created by her boyfriend. Context is everything, and without the other images, Patricia cannot see what Thomas sees, even when he points out the body in the print. This scene foreshadows the film's most devastating moment, when Thomas, having floundered his way through a nocturnal London landscape of indolent rock concerts and pot-fogged parties, returns to the park in the morning, only to discover that the body has vanished. Has Thomas been conned, or has he conned himself?

Nearly a decade later, Hemmings recalled his role in this film with Deep Red, which also features a protagonist who sees a clue he does not understand. Where Dario Argento is fixated on the inadequacy of memory and the intellect, however, Antonioni's cynicism is directed towards our imperfect organs, both biological and mechanical. The eye and the camera are to be mistrusted. Blow-Up serves as a marvelous time capsule of an unmistakable pop cultural moment, but its obsessions go far beyond the mod bric-a-brac that litters the frame. Just as Michael Haneke would do forty years later in Caché, Antonioni is engaged in a cinematic dissertation on artifice, and on the limitations and vulnerabilities of observation. The world of fashion emerges as a natural backdrop for the film's deeply skeptical stance towards images as a substitute for reality, and towards humankind's ability to discern truth with its own lying eyes. In this, there are echoes of Blow-Up in later works as diverse as JFK (recall that bravura sequence of the Life photo forgery) and the documentary Standard Operating Procedure, but Antonioni's film is novel in the manner in which is at once revels in surface imagery and undermines it at every turn.

PostedFebruary 3, 2011
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesDiary
1 CommentPost a comment
RabbitHolePoster.jpg

Rabbit Hole

2010 // USA // John Cameron Mitchell // January 26, 2011 // Theatrical Print (Landmark Theaters Plaza Frontenac Cinema)

B- - Everything that occurs within Rabbit Hole revolves around a personal cataclysm that is only hinted at for the first twenty minutes or so of the film, a stratagem that proves wholly consistent with the work's interest in the phenomena of emotional evasion and suppression. The young son of polished upper-middle-class strivers Becca (Nicole Kidman) and Howie (Aaron Eckhart) perished eight months ago in a car accident, and although their life is not necessarily in tatters, the couple's unresolved grief crouches in the room, mocking their hollow gestures towards normalcy. John Cameron Mitchell--creator of brash and bratty indie gambits like Hedwig and Angry Inch and Shortbus--isn't the obvious choice to helm David Lindsay-Abaire's adaptation of his own play. While Mitchell's direction is assured and sensitive to the nuances and diversity of human emotion, Rabbit Hole too often feels like a grimly dutiful exploration of a character blueprint, rather than an authentic tale of sorrow. For a story about unthinkable loss, it exhibits a curious lack of poignancy, one that cannot be explained entirely by Becca's ruthless shuttering of her emotional landscape. It's a distinguished film, but frigidly so, and rarely distinctive, apart from its embrace of a curious, scientific sort of solace befitting a faithless world.

PostedFebruary 3, 2011
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesQuick Reviews
CommentPost a comment
DogDayAfternoonGrab01.jpg

Dog Day Afternoon

1975 // USA // Sidney Lumet // January 21, 2010 // Theatrical Print (Webster University Moore Auditorium)​

[Dog Day Afternoon was screened on January 21-23, 2010 as a part of the Webster University Film Series' retrospective on the films of actor John Cazale.]

Perhaps it's a bit discourteous to dwell on Al Pacino's presence in a film that was screened to celebrate the lamentably brief, searingly vital career of John Cazale. To be sure, Cazale's Sal provides a crucial counterpoint to Pacino's Sonny: simmering with limp anxiety, Sal seems to be genuinely tormented by the moral dimensions of their bank heist-turned-fiasco, but he also seems to harbor a deeper, more ominous ugliness in his soul than the hot-blooded Sonny. (Witness Sal's curiously menacing and self-righteous scolding of Penelope Allen's teller when she elects to indulge in a cigarette.) Still, I keep returning to how novel Sonny is as a character in the arc of Pacino's career: He possesses the characteristic brashness that we expect from the actor, but none of the self-possession, none of the bellowing, monarchical vanity that colors even the moments of out-of-control helplessness in his signature roles. Sonny is, in a word, lost, and the wide, darting eyes, twitching mouth, and short-guy strut that are the actor's stock and trade here seem like the reflexes of a man stretched so thin he can no longer tell authenticity from artifice. (Which, of course, is of a piece with the film's fascination with the theater of mass media "news".) Sonny's sole moment of calm certainty comes when he dictates his will, which he does with the kind of fatalism and unassuming emotion that seems pitch-perfect for a Brooklyn Catholic. And yet, his fearful utterance later in the film--"Please don't kill me!"--betrays a man who is not ready to die, who made out his will because, perhaps, that's what he assumed a bank robber in a standoff with police should do.

PostedJanuary 23, 2011
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesDiary
CommentPost a comment
TrueGritPoster.jpg

True Grit

Possessing a Sharp Tongue and Bountiful Sand

2010 // USA // Joel and Ethan Coen // December 28, 2010 // Theatrical Print (AMC Esquire)​

B+ - True Grit finds the Coen Brothers, those mischievous delvers of American genre, working for the first time within the parameters of the classical Western, a form that they pursue in a curiously straightforward manner, by and large without their customary cocked eye. The Coens have never been deconstructionists, preferring to employ genre as a valid tool to explore their perennial thematic preoccupations. These, of course, include the random preposterousness of the cosmos, the failure of carefully constructed worldviews, the fundamental venality of humanity, and--when relief from such dire considerations is warranted--the glimmers of comfort that are nonetheless attainable from time to time, usually by means of a simple adjustment in outlook. One might expect these typical concerns to be highlighted in the Brothers' adaptation of Charles Portis' novel about a precocious fourteen-year-old girl searching for her father's murderer in mid-nineteenth-century Indian Territory. However, the source material seems to have compelled to Coens to venture into fresh thematic terrain. While their trademark absurdism still rears its head in places, the film is foremost fixated on the problem of moral systems, and how they are developed, hardened, and revealed. True Grit is also, not coincidentally, the Coens' most intently psychological film in years. While it never attains the searing cinematic greatness of their recent existential pictures (No Country For Old Men and A Serious Man), it possesses the undeniable appeal of a work made by two masters operating slightly outside their comfort zone.

In an opening voiceover, young Arkansan Mattie Ross (a heavenly Hailee Steinfeld) explains her unhappy dilemma: a no-good cowardly drunk named Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin, channeling Ted Levine) has shot and killed her father over a perceived slight, and fled into the Territory with the slain man's horse and money. Mattie is a bright, blunt-spoken firecracker in a calico dress and plaits, the sort of girl couldn't be dissuaded from her path by the Devil himself, and who possesses a remarkably ability to size up anyone's character at a glance. She arrives in town and takes charge of the situation, claiming her father's body and settling his unresolved business with a local horse dealer, exhibiting all the savvy of a Marrakesh merchant. She also makes it plain to everyone within earshot that revenge is on her agenda, and her gaze quickly settles on U.S. Marshall Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges), an ornery, drunken, one-eyed grizzly of a lawman with a reputation for ruthlessness. Negotiations and bit of underhandedness ensue, and eventually Mattie and the Marshall set out for the Territory, meanwhile acquiring an ally and rival in the person of preening Texas Ranger LaBoeuf (Matt Damon), who intends to bring Chaney back to Lone Star justice for unrelated crimes. The remainder of the film is occupied with this unlikely trio's trek into the wintery landscape of Arkansas and present-day Oklahoma, where Chaney has allegedly fallen in with a gang led by "Lucky" Ned Pepper (Barry Pepper), a longtime Cogburn nemesis.

The film's dialogue reportedly hews closely to that of the Portis novel, and belongs to the same school of affected cowboy poetics that was flaunted with such phenomenal poise in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. True Grit approaches its educated hillbilly vernacular from a more congenial place, one less concerned with lush gravity than engaging pop and crackle. Despite the film's sobering subject matter, the dialog is closest kin to the dense, quotable back-and-forth that characterizes the Brothers' overtly comedic ventures: Raising Arizona, The Big Lebowski, and O Brother, Where Art Thou? For a film about bloody vengeance, True Grit summons an unexpected plethora of smiles, almost always due to the manner in which the principals deliver their lines, particularly Steinfeld and Bridges. Oddly enough, although this approach risks painting the film's protagonists as droll cartoons rather than three-dimensional people, it ultimately succeeds in charming rather than distancing, and fits snugly with the film's warm, intimate treatment of its main characters.

The Coens, as is their custom, treat the film's scenario and the tropes that meander through it with affectionate regard, and not a little bit of humor. However, what sets True Grit apart from other works from the Brothers is the level of satirical bite, which has been scaled back significantly here. Mattie, Cogburn, and LaBoeuf are all blemished to one degree or another (the men more so than Mattie), but they're the first Coen protagonists since Fargo's Marge Gunderson who could be said to be genuine classical heroes, as opposed to villains, scoundrels, dupes, or "heroes" whose victories are entirely accidental. When their time comes, all three reveal themselves to be courageous, decisive, and honorable, despite their flaws. This approach to character is of a piece with the earnestness of True Grit's working mode, one that is interested in using Western idioms to unironically probe how our moral codes are tested by unforeseen circumstances, not to mention by the oppositional codes of others. Lying beyond humanity's laws and crawling with natural perils, the frontier setting of the Western is, of course, a fitting arena for such explorations. The Coens use True Grit's gray, slushy, post-Civil War landscape to good effect in this respect, conjuring a realm in which knowledge and values are more essential to survival than the amenities of civilization. Behind the camera as usual is Coen co-conspirator and living legend Roger Deakins, who captures the film's intimate spaces and forlorn vistas with his typically striking eye, and regards the visages of the performers with both familiar ease and a kind of folkloric enchantment.

The film contains abundant references to the filmic mythology of John Wayne--including, of course, the 1969 Henry Hathaway adaptation of the novel--and to a host of older generic clichés. Such allusions run to the acidly critical at times (and not unjustly so), but the Coens are not concerned with excavating the Western tradition so much as acknowledging the plain roots of their film, much as Scorsese did in Shutter Island, though without the latter's effusive cinephilic eagerness. Time and again, the Brothers draw from the customary Western toolbox for the film's narrative and visual language, an approach that preserves the tale's mythic credence and crucial patina of Old Testament murk. It's no mistake that Mattie's prim and forthright Protestantism governs the film's overall tone, and that within that world Cogburn's slovenly vices and LaBoeuf's hotheaded vanity seem particularly transgressive. (The two men are ostensibly Mattie's allies, but also the foes who test her code the most rigorously.)

This being a Coen film, True Grit functions marvelously well within its generic boundaries, reflecting the Brothers' fascination with the potential of established cinematic forms. The film gratifies as a lyrical, rough-edged tale of violent revenge on the frontier, but like any Western of even modest ambition, there's a bit more going on under its dusty surface. The genre's customary musings on race, gender, faith, and the role of violence are all present (sometimes subtly), but the Coens have focused their adaptation most conspicuously on Mattie's moral journey from childhood to adulthood. This is underlined by the camera's frequent assumption of her vantage point, whether in the branches of a tree, perched on a ridge, or lying on the ground. At fourteen, Mattie has already adopted a rigorous moral framework that evidently serves her well, and True Grit is the tale of the bloody testing of that framework in the "real world". (The fallacy of such distinctions being partly revealed by Mattie's gleaming competence in nearly every practical endeavor save gunplay.) Her father's murder thrusts her into a situation that is more treacherous than those to which she is accustomed, and places her in proximity to a variety of men with entrenched moral systems of their own. True Grit therefore represents a kind of moral voyeurism, as we watch a child's code undergo affirmation and adjustment into the code of an adult. In this, the film is revealed as a warmer cousin to the films of Michael Mann, who has long been absorbed with codes of morality and how they collide with circumstance. The film's symbolism can be a bit heavy-handed at times: Mattie's first successful act of violence, for example, plops her into a literal dark pit filled with serpents. However hoary its methods, however, the film's explorations are refreshing and unexpectedly fascinating. True Grit is an uncommonly momentous treatment of the process of moral maturation and of the intersection of inner conviction and outer reality (and from a female perspective, at that). With the Coens, it should no longer be a surprise that such rich veins can be discovered within cinematic forms that are perennially declared exhausted of their potential.

PostedJanuary 2, 2011
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesReviews
4 CommentsPost a comment
TheFighterPoster.jpg

The Fighter

2010 // USA // David O. Russell // December 26, 2010 // Theatrical Print (St. Louis Cinemas Chase Park Plaza)

B- - There's little that's ground-breaking in The Fighter, David O. Russell's grimy, amusing worm's-eye portrait of light welterweight boxing champion Mickey "Irish" Ward (an appropriately bulked and vulnerable Mark Wahlberg). The story sticks to the tropes of countless tales about working-class kids who escapes their dismal surroundings through excellence in one sphere or another. Meanwhile, the film's 1990s Lowell, Massachusetts setting is saturated with the sort of affectionately misshapen blue-collar Bay State characters and locales that now serve as stock cinematic fodder. This isn't to say that Russell's film is without its appealing features, chief among them the director's facility for rendering his boxing sequences with enviable vitality and sensational drama. Christian Bale, as Ward's crack-addicted, ex-fighter brother (and sometimes trainer) Dick-Eklund, undergoes yet another astonishing physical transformation, here into a sweaty, bug-eyed heap of deceit and cloying reassurances. While the lack of ambition in Russell's approach to the material is often unsatisfactory, the film proffers its share of lingering elements. These range from the garish, as in Mickey's assemblage of dog-faced, sailor-mouthed older sisters, to the reserved, as in the smears of bright blue icing on a character's skin and clothes. There are just enough of these memorable particulars to save The Fighter from dismissal.
PostedDecember 30, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesQuick Reviews
CommentPost a comment
AProphetPoster.jpg

A Prophet

2009 // France - Italy // Jacques Audiard // December 24, 2010 // Netflix Instant

B+ - In recent years, even arthouse cinemas seem to have been overrun with gangster epics, and although the mother tongue often changes, the cadences are usually the same. Fortunately, Jacques Audiard's mostly prison-bound entry in the subgenre, A Prophet, proves to be a vibrant and exceptional dramatic work, one that elbows conventions and repeatedly surprises without feeling the need to burn its underlying formula to the ground. Much of the film's absorbing and lithe character lies in the manner in which it regards its anti-hero, Malik (Tahar Rahim), an nonreligious Arab who enters the French corrections system without family or allies, and receives a six-year crash course in the acquisition and safeguarding of power. Rahim's estimable performance—part whipped mongrel, part prowling panthe—and Audiard's peculiar flourishes of magical realism provide glimpses of the man's emotional terrain, but the details of his schemes are often shuttered away from the viewer until the last moment. Accordingly, the film works remarkably well strictly as a bloody, smoldering thriller where the narrative's precise trajectory is deliciously uncertain. More broadly, A Prophet refreshes in its shades-of-gray stance towards nakedly self-interested behavior, in its grim assessment of the clashes between self-respect and ambition, and in the specificity of its contemporary French setting, so awash in social and ethnic shudders.
PostedDecember 30, 2010
AuthorAndrew Wyatt
CategoriesQuick Reviews
CommentPost a comment
Newer / Older
RT_CRITIC_TM_BADGE.jpg
The Take-Up Podcast

Twin Peaks: The Return

2007 - 2016: A Personal Cinematic Canon

download.png

Recent Posts

Blog
New Reviews at The Take-Up
about 7 years ago
Miles to Go Before I Sleep
about 8 years ago
Delete Your Account: 'Friend Request'
about 8 years ago
Feminine Mystique: 'mother!'
about 8 years ago
Unmuffled Screams and Broken Hearts - 'Twin Peaks: The Return,' Parts 17 and 18
about 8 years ago
Send in the Clown: 'It'
about 8 years ago
Unmuffled Screams and Broken Hearts - Twin Peaks: The Return, Part 16
about 8 years ago
Fetal Infraction: Prevenge
about 8 years ago
You Don’t Know Why, But You’re Dying to Try: The Lure
about 8 years ago
Unmuffled Screams and Broken Hearts - Twin Peaks: The Return, Part 15
about 8 years ago

© 2007 – 2025 Andrew Wyatt